|
AN EXPLANATION OF HOW A FOOD SAFETY LAW MAY IMPACT PEST MANAGEMENT ON ORNAMENTAL PLANTS |
The Food Quality Protection Act ( FQPA) became a law on August 3, 1996. The purpose of this law is to protect the public from pesticide residues found in dietary and non-dietary sources. In order to accomplish this goal, the FQPA changes components of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) which ensures food safety and regulates the tolerance of pesticide residues and the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) which governs the registration and use of pesticides.
The FQPA implemented a number of changes to FFDCA and FIFRA, including these major provisions that have the potential to impact the ornamental plant industry.
In addition, the FQPA requires that risks other than carcinogenicity (the ability of a given compound to cause cancer) be considered. Factors such as endocrine disruption (mimicking the effects of estrogen or testosterone in the human body), teratogenicity (the ability of a compound to cause gross malformations of the developing fetus), and mutagenicity (the ability of a compound to cause cell mutations) must also be considered in estimating the relative safety of a pesticide.
Why should nursery professionals need to worry about pesticide residues in food crops -- with the exception of fruit trees and shrubs, the plants that are produced by the nursery industry are not edible commodities. Many of the compounds used on nursery crops, however, are also used on many food crops, and unacceptable residues have been detected in food crops. These residues contribute to the toxicity loading of these foods, and add to the amount in the risk cup, and so the compound will be under increased scrutiny for banning or for a change in use registration. For example, iprodione, the active ingredient in Chipco, is low in acute and chronic toxicity, but it is classed by the EPA as a "probable human carcinogen," which accounts for most of its toxicity loading. The registration of iprodione will be reviewed by the EPA for this reason.
In order to review tolerances, the EPA is collecting pesticide use data to make decisions on risk assessment. The two data components are exposure data and application rates. For exposure data, results will depend on where samples taken for analysis are gathered. For application rates, without real-world data, EPA will assume maximum use rates and treatment applications on the maximum crop acres.
As pesticides are reviewed, chemical manufacturers may learn that certain classes of pesticides have exceeded the risk cup. (At this time, carbamates and organophosphates are under going review by EPA. Fungicides detected at high levels in certain food commodities will be evaluated soon thereafter.) If this occurs, manufacturers will have to change the label in regards to their use or change formulations so that products are safer. A more drastic option available to manufacturers is to drop specific uses or the production of the pesticide all together. This is where minor use crops, such as greenhouse, nursery and turf crops, could be at risk. Minor use crops are those grown on fewer than 300,000 acres, including nursery crops. If a chemical active ingredient is available for both minor use and major crops (corn, cotton, soybean and wheat), pesticide manufacturers may chose to remove minor use crops from the label to fit the product into the risk cup; while at the same time, still reaching the more profitable major crop markets. The future of pesticide active ingredients is still very much undecided.
There is the potential that the Green Industry may see changes to their current pesticide options. Some insecticides labeled for use on ornamental plants that are currently under review include: carbamates - bendiocarb (Dycarb, Turcam) and carbaryl (Sevin); and the organophosphates -acephate (Orthene, Pinpoint), azinphos-methyl (Guthion), chlorpyrifos (Dursban, DuraGuard), diazinon, dimethoate (Cygon), disulfoton (Di-Syston), malathion, naled (Dibrom), oxythioquinox (Joust, Morestan) and phosmet (Imidan).
Fungicides currently labeled for use on nursery crops that will be reviewed in the near future include: captan, chlorothalonil (Daconil), DCNA (Botran), iprodione (Chipco, Ronilan), PCNB (Terrachlor), thiabendazole (Mertect), triadimefon (Bayleton), and vinclozolin (Ronilan).
Now is the time to evaluate your pesticides to see which are the most important to your business. What will the outcome be if this product is lost? Are there alternatives? Also, if asked by a state or national association, provide real-use pesticide data so that these groups can accurately respond to EPA or USDA. There is little pesticide use data available to EPA for minor use crops. So, it will not be beneficial if they use their conservative estimate of pesticide use.
However, there is some good news. The Food Quality Protection Act requires that EPA give special attention to pesticides that are important to IPM or for managing resistant pests. Thus, some pesticides may be retained because of their unique role in pest management.
There are some insecticides that are not under review that you may want to incorporate into your pest management practices. You may already be familiar with some of these products and use one or more in your pest management program. If you are not familiar with these materials, there are a couple of points to consider. Certain products may not be labeled for the specific pest of concern. Also, because of their mode of action, some of the biological insecticides may kill pests more slowly than the more familiar synthetic chemicals. Remember to follow the label instructions.
Azadirachtin (Azatin XL, Neem) is an insect growth regulator derived from the neem tree. It is labeled for aphids, cankerworm caterpillars, leaf hoppers and whiteflies.
Bacillus thuringiensis (Dipel, MVP II) contains bacterial spores that produce a destructive toxin when ingested. It is labeled for early instar caterpillars, but not sawfly larvae.
Beauvaria bassiana (Naturalis-O, Naturalis-T) is made of insect-attacking fungal spores that infect through contact. Naturalis-O is labeled for aphids, mites, leaf-feeding caterpillars and leaf hoppers. Naturalis-T attacks billbugs, chinch bugs, cutworms and sod webworms.
Horticultural oil (Sunspray Ultra Fine Spray Oil) is a refined petroleum product that blocks breathing holes (spiracles) and/or piercing-sucking mouth-parts of insects. It is labeled for soft-bodied insects such as aphids, mites, scale crawlers, lace bugs, mealy bugs and whiteflies.
Imidacloprid (Marathon, Merit) is a soil-applied systemic insecticide labeled for aphids, adelgids, lace bugs, leafminers, soft scales, whiteflies and white grubs.
Insecticidal soap (Olympic Insecticidal Soap, Safer Soap) is produced from biodegradable fatty acids and labeled for aphids, caterpillars, lace bugs, mites and scale crawlers.
Insect pathogenic nematodes (Heterorhabditis bacteriophora and Steinernema carpocapsae.). H. bacteriophora is a cruiser-type nematode labeled for weevil larvae, white grubs and wood borer larvae. S. carpocapsae is an ambusher-type nematode that attacks armyworms, cutworms, sod webworms and wood borer larvae.
Spinosad (Conserve SC) is a toxin derived from the soil-dwelling organism Saccharopolyspora spinosa. It is labeled for caterpillars, sawfly larvae, gall midges, Dipterous (fly) leafminers and leaf-feeding beetles.
Unfortunately, for many of the fungicides under consideration for registration changes, there are no good alternatives. Nursery professionals will have to rely on increased use of IPM and other cultural practices to reduce the impact of diseases.
This is only a brief introduction to the Food Quality Protection Act and its potential impact on ornamental plant production and care. Further information can be found at the following websites:
Environmental
Protection Agency
American Nursery and Landscape
Association
PestLaw Online
Pest Management at the Crossroads
American Crop Protection Association
by:
Tim Abbey, Nursery IPM Specialist, Connecticut Agricultural Experiment
Station, Windsor, CT
Vicki Smith, Ornamental Plant Pathologist, Connecticut Agricultural
Experiment Station, New Haven, CT
from: YANKEE GROWER. MAY/JUNE 1999. Volume 1, Number 3. p.3-5
This information was developed for conditions in the Northeast. Use in other geographical areas may be inappropriate.
The information in this material is for educational purposes. The recommendations contained are based on the best available knowledge at the time of printing. Any reference to commercial products, trade or brand names is for information only, and no endorsement or approval is intended. The Cooperative Extension system does not guarantee or warrant the standard of any product referenced or imply approval of the product to the exclusion of others which also may be available.All agrochemicals/pesticides listed are registered for suggested uses in accordance with federal and Connecticut state laws and regulations as of the date of printing. If the information does not agree with current labeling, follow the label instructions. The label is the law.Warning! Agrochemicals/pesticides are dangerous. Read and follow all instructions and safety precautions on labels. Carefully handle and store agrochemicals/pesticides in originally labeled containers immediately in a safe manner and place. Contact the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection for current regulations.The user of this information assumes all risks for personal injury or property damage.Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Kirklyn M. Kerr, Director, Cooperative Extension System, The University of Connecticut, Storrs. The Connecticut Cooperative Extension System offers its programs to persons regardless of race, color, national origin, sex, age or disability and is an equal opportunity employer.