
In
1997, we conducted a couple of small trials at UConn to compare
yields between some of the virus/powdery mildew resistant squash
varieties that are on the market, or soon will be.
Most of the varieties tested resist or tolerate 1-3 of the 5-6 important mosaic virus diseases that may infect squash (table 1 and table 2). Therefore, until breeders stack resistant genes to all of the common viruses within a single variety there is still a chance of late-season virus problems.
Powdery mildew (PM) is another important late-season disease of squash which can now be combated with resistant varieties. General Patton, a straightneck summer squash from Asgrow, and a numbered zucchini variety being developed by Rogers Seed Company (ZS-23) proved to have a good degree of PM tolerance. Both varieties produced the most fruit per plant for their respective trials.
We made a single late-season planting (16 July) of 10 zucchini and 5 summer squash varieties at the University of Connecticut's Plant Science Research Farm. Despite planting two to three seeds per hill, one variety in each trial failed to germinate. The two trials (zucchini and summer squash) utilized three plants per plot and were replicated three times in a randomized complete block design. Plants were spaced every two feet in rows four feet apart. The plots received a broadcast application of 1000 pounds of 5-10-10 (N-P-K) and were sidedressed on 5 September with 30 pounds of nitrogen. All marketable-size fruit were harvested every three to four days, for a total of eight times, between 2 and 26 September. No fungicides or insecticides were used.
The fruit quality, shape and color of all the varieties that emerged met marketable standards; producing relatively straight, smooth, glossy squash. Tigress was slightly lighter, while Jaguar was darker in color than the other zucchini tested. All of the squash trialed were straightneck varieties. Virus symptoms occurred on only two plants in the entire experiment (no symptoms on any fruit), and thus severity of infection was not rated. Plants were rated for the degree of PM infection on the final day of harvest.
Table 1 Return to top of page
Resistant Zucchini Trials 1997
|
|
Resistance1 | Company | #Fruit/Plant | Wt(lbs)Plant | Powdery Mildew2 Disease Rating |
| Revenue | ZYMV,WMV,CMV | Rogers | 6.00 a | 3.75 a | 3.3 ab |
| ZS-23 | PM | Rogers | 6.3 a | 3.63 a | 1.1 d |
| Jaguar | ZYMV,WMV | Harris Moran | 5.17 a | 3.34 ab | 3.1 ab |
| 1776 | ZYMV,WMV | Asgrow | 4.78 bc | 3.22 ab | 3.0 bc |
| ACX34 |
|
3.34 c | 2.70 bc | 3.3 ab | |
| Dividend | ZYMV,WMV,CMV | Rogers | 5.00 ab | 2.63 bc | 3.8 a |
| Puma | SQMV | Harris Moran | 3.55 bc | 2.16 c | 3.2 ab |
| Tigress | ZYMV,WMV | Harris Moran | 3.00 c | 2.06 c | 3.3 ab |
| 1814 | ZYMV,WMV | Asgrow | 3.11 c | 1.98 c | 3.3 ab |
LSD:5%
1Resistance: PM = powdery mildew, ZYMV = zucchini mosaic virus, WMV = watermelon mosaic virus, CMV = cucumber mosaic virus, SQMV = squash mosaic virus
2Disease Rating: 0 = no disease, 1 = lower leaves infected, 2 = lower, mid-leaves and stems infected, 3 = whole plant infected (light), 4 = moderate to severe infection, 5 = dead or dying
Table 2 Return to top of page
Resistant Summer Squash Trials 1997
|
|
Resistance1 |
|
#Fruit/Plant | Wt(lbs)Plant | Powdery Mildew2 Disease Rating |
| General Patton | PM, Prec. | Asgrow | 10.34 a | 2.95 a | 1.5 b |
| Precious II | Prec. | Abbot & Cobb | 8.00 ab | 2.66 ab | 2.2 a |
| Multipik | Prec. | Harris Moran | 7.55 ab | 2.22 ab | 2.2 a |
| Superpik | Prec. | Harris Moran | 0.77 b | 1.63 b | 2.3 a |
LSD:5%
1Resistance: PM = powdery mildew, Prec. = Precocious gene masks fruit color breaks caused by cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) and watermelon mosaic virus (WMV).
2Disease Rating: 0 = no disease, 1 = lower leaves infected, 2 = lower, mid-leaves and stems infected, 3 = whole plant infected (light), 4 = moderate to severe infection, 5 = dead or dying
Jude Boucher, IPM Program Leader, Vegetable Crops and Gianna Nixon, IPM Program Assistant, University of Connecticut
Published in Grower, New England Vegetable and Small Fruit Newsletter vol. 98-4, April 1998.
The information in this material is for educational purposes. The recommendations contained are based on the best available knowledge at the time of printing. Any reference to commercial products, trade or brand names is for information only, and no endorsement or approval is intended. The Cooperative Extension system does not guarantee or warrant the standard of any product referenced or imply approval of the product to the exclusion of others which also may be available.All agrochemicals/pesticides listed are registered for suggested uses in accordance with federal and Connecticut state laws and regulations as of the date of printing. If the information does not agree with current labeling, follow the label instructions. The label is the law.Warning! Agrochemicals/pesticides are dangerous. Read and follow all instructions and safety precautions on labels. Carefully handle and store agrochemicals/pesticides in originally labeled containers immediately in a safe manner and place. Contact the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection for current regulations.The user of this information assumes all risks for personal injury or property damage.Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Kirklyn M. Kerr, Director, Cooperative Extension System, The University of Connecticut, Storrs. The Connecticut Cooperative Extension System offers its programs to persons regardless of race, color, national origin, sex, age or disability and is an equal opportunity employer.